A friend of mine from back home sent me a story from the St. Louis Dispatch about a recent graduate who had moved to India. Sounds familiar. I guess I’m not the only one.
But my frustration with the writer, and the story itself, began after reading the headline: “How bad is it? Job market lands St. Louis grad in India.” Apparently this kid views moving to India as some sort of unemployment exile. While I might not be in India had I received some great job offer after graduation, I think of my move in terms of reasons to move to India as opposed to reasons not to stay in the U.S.
But it gets better. The writer is simply amazed that this kid can download “Mad Men” from his seemingly backwater apartment. And he can barely comprehend that fact that some people prefer to read the newspaper in print. (Mr. Giegerich, lots of people in the U.S. still prefer newsprint, too.)
But the best part comes when the article talks about how the kid doesn’t plan to stay in India for very long:
For one thing, the tourist visa issued Hudson under India’s quirky immigration laws require him to take a two-month break every six months.
Ah, yes, those quirky immigration laws that require tourists to eventually leave the country. But wait a second. Shouldn’t he have an employment visa if he’s working? Yes.
“Technically, I’m an illegal worker,” he said, adding that “luckily, everything in India happens informally.”
Wait. Everything in India happens informally. Silly me. Why then did I wait weeks for appropriate paperwork from my employer, pay $143 for an employment visa and wait in line in an office downtown Chicago?
So I don’t have to tell my future employers that I worked as an illegal immigrant in India.









